AI

Exposed: Uzbekistan’s Alarming Nationwide License Plate Surveillance System Leaks Millions of Tracking Records

Uzbekistan's exposed license plate surveillance system monitoring Tashkent traffic intersection

In a startling security revelation from Central Asia, Uzbekistan’s entire national license plate surveillance network has been exposed to the internet without password protection, allowing unrestricted access to millions of vehicle tracking records and real-time monitoring data. Security researcher Anurag Sen discovered this critical vulnerability earlier this month, uncovering a system that tracks thousands of vehicles daily across major Uzbek cities and rural border regions. The exposure provides unprecedented insight into how governments implement mass vehicle surveillance while raising urgent questions about data protection standards in an increasingly monitored world.

Uzbekistan’s Nationwide License Plate Surveillance System Architecture

Uzbekistan’s surveillance infrastructure represents a comprehensive approach to traffic monitoring and law enforcement. The system operates through approximately one hundred camera banks strategically positioned across the country. These high-resolution devices continuously scan license plates and vehicle occupants, capturing violations ranging from red-light infractions to seatbelt non-compliance. Furthermore, the system specifically targets unlicensed vehicles operating during nighttime hours.

The technical implementation reveals sophisticated capabilities. Cameras manufactured by Singapore-based Holowits capture 4K resolution footage, while the overarching “intelligence traffic management system” comes from Maxvision, a Shenzhen-based company specializing in internet-connected traffic technologies. Maxvision exports similar surveillance products globally to countries including Burkina Faso, Kuwait, Oman, Mexico, and Saudi Arabia.

Geographic Distribution and Monitoring Scope

Analysis of the exposed database reveals extensive geographic coverage. Cameras concentrate in Tashkent, Uzbekistan’s capital, with additional clusters in southern cities like Jizzakh and Qarshi, and eastern locations including Namangan. Surprisingly, surveillance extends to rural areas near Uzbekistan’s once-disputed border with Tajikistan. This comprehensive coverage enables tracking vehicles across the entire nation.

The system’s database, established in September 2024, began active traffic monitoring in mid-2025. It contains millions of photographs and raw video footage, along with precise GPS coordinates for each camera location. Some surveillance points even appear visible on Google Street View, demonstrating their integration into public infrastructure.

Security Lapse Discovery and Immediate Implications

Security researcher Anurag Sen identified the exposed system earlier this month and promptly notified StockPil. The database required no authentication, granting anyone with internet access the ability to view sensitive surveillance data. This included real-time tracking information, violation footage, and system administration interfaces.

Sen’s discovery reveals concerning operational details. The system tracked one particular driver over six months as he traveled regularly between Chirchiq, Tashkent, and Eshonguzar. This case demonstrates the system’s persistent tracking capabilities, which could theoretically monitor any vehicle among millions registered nationwide.

Government response has been notably absent. Uzbekistan’s Department of Public Security, which operates the system through the Ministry of Internal Affairs, failed to respond to multiple emails requesting comment during December. Similarly, Uzbek government representatives in Washington, D.C. and New York provided no acknowledgment. Even Uzbekistan’s computer emergency readiness team, UZCERT, only returned automated replies to security alerts.

Global Context: Surveillance Systems and Security Vulnerabilities

Uzbekistan’s exposure follows similar incidents worldwide, highlighting systemic security issues in surveillance infrastructure. Earlier this week, independent news outlet 404 Media reported that Flock Safety, a major U.S. surveillance provider, left dozens of license plate reading cameras publicly exposed. A reporter successfully watched themselves being tracked in real time through these vulnerable systems.

Historical context reveals this problem persists over years. In 2019, StockPil documented over one hundred exposed license plate readers accessible from the internet. Security researchers repeatedly warned law enforcement agencies about these vulnerabilities, yet many systems remained unprotected for extended periods. Earlier this year, Wired reported more than 150 U.S. license plate readers and their collected data were similarly exposed without security measures.

Comparative Surveillance System Exposures
Location Year Discovered Systems Exposed Data Accessibility
United States (Multiple) 2025 150+ LPR systems Real-time tracking data
United States (Flock) 2025 Dozens of cameras Live monitoring access
Global (Various) 2019 100+ LPR systems Historical tracking data
Uzbekistan (National) 2025 ~100 camera banks Complete system access

Technical Capabilities and Privacy Concerns

The exposed Uzbek system demonstrates advanced technical features. Its web-based interface includes a comprehensive dashboard allowing operators to examine violation footage with zoom capabilities. The system captures both violation-specific images and broader contextual footage of surrounding vehicles. While StockPil redacted license plates and occupants before publication, the raw data contained identifiable information.

Maxvision’s promotional materials emphasize their system’s capabilities. A LinkedIn video claims cameras can record the “entire illegal process” and display “illegal and passing information in real-time.” This real-time functionality, combined with nationwide coverage, creates unprecedented tracking potential.

Broader Implications for Global Surveillance Practices

Uzbekistan’s exposure arrives during significant expansion of license plate surveillance worldwide. The United States continues building its nationwide array of license plate readers, many provided by surveillance companies like Flock. This parallel development raises important questions about security standards as surveillance technology proliferates.

The incident highlights several critical issues:

  • Data Security Standards: Government surveillance systems often lack basic security measures
  • Vendor Responsibility: International technology providers must ensure secure implementations
  • Transparency Deficits: Citizens frequently remain unaware of surveillance capabilities
  • International Norms: Global standards for surveillance system security remain underdeveloped

Privacy advocates express particular concern about systems that combine facial recognition with license plate reading. While the exposed Uzbek system focuses on license plates, the high-resolution cameras and occupant monitoring capabilities create potential for expanded surveillance applications.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Mass vehicle surveillance systems operate in complex legal environments. Uzbekistan’s system, operated by the Department of Public Security, serves legitimate law enforcement purposes like traffic violation enforcement and stolen vehicle recovery. However, the security lapse exposes citizens to potential misuse of their movement data.

International human rights organizations monitor surveillance system implementations globally. They emphasize proportionality principles, arguing surveillance should match specific security needs rather than enabling indiscriminate monitoring. The Uzbek system’s nationwide coverage and detailed tracking capabilities may exceed reasonable proportionality standards.

Conclusion

Uzbekistan’s exposed license plate surveillance system reveals fundamental tensions between security objectives and privacy protections in the digital age. The comprehensive tracking capabilities, combined with inadequate security measures, create risks for millions of citizens while providing valuable lessons for global surveillance practices. As nations worldwide expand vehicle monitoring systems, this incident underscores the urgent need for robust security standards, transparent oversight mechanisms, and balanced approaches to public safety and individual privacy. The system remains exposed at publication time, serving as a stark reminder of vulnerabilities in increasingly connected surveillance infrastructures.

FAQs

Q1: What exactly was exposed in Uzbekistan’s surveillance system?
The entire national license plate tracking database was accessible without passwords, including millions of vehicle photos, real-time tracking data, violation footage, camera locations, and system administration interfaces.

Q2: How long was the surveillance system exposed online?
While the exact duration remains unclear, system artifacts indicate database creation in September 2024 with traffic monitoring beginning mid-2025. The exposure was discovered in December 2025.

Q3: Who manufactures the surveillance technology used in Uzbekistan?
The “intelligence traffic management system” comes from Maxvision, a Shenzhen-based company, while cameras are manufactured by Singapore-based Holowits. Maxvision exports similar systems globally.

Q4: Has this type of exposure happened elsewhere?
Yes, similar exposures occurred in the United States with Flock Safety cameras (2025) and numerous license plate readers (2019, 2025). These incidents reveal systemic security issues in surveillance infrastructure.

Q5: What should governments do to prevent such exposures?
Governments should implement basic security measures like password protection, regular security audits, data encryption, access controls, and vulnerability disclosure programs for surveillance systems.

Q6: What are the privacy implications of such surveillance systems?
Nationwide license plate tracking enables persistent monitoring of citizens’ movements, potentially chilling free movement and association while creating risks of data misuse if systems lack proper safeguards.

To Top